U.S. Government Spends $16 Million To Promote The Swine Flu Vaccine

As the backlash against the coming swine flu vaccine continues to grow, the U.S. government has committed 16 million taxpayer dollars to promote the swine flu vaccine to the American people. Those willing to be test subjects for the experimental swine flu vaccine are being paid cash at clinics around the country, and government officials plan a full-court press in the weeks ahead to try to convince the American people that the swine flu vaccine is safe and that everyone needs to take it.

Rather than take the time to fully test the swine flu vaccine properly, U.S. health authorities are charging ahead like the world is about to end.

It isn't like people are dropping dead from the swine flu all over the place. But instead of proceeding in a cautious manner, health officials are eagerly testing the swine flu vaccine wherever they can find willing volunteers.

In fact, they are paying good money to many of these volunteers.

Early reports had indicated that participants in swine flu trials around the U.S. were being paid fifty dollars to participate, but it looks like the price may have gone up substantially - at least in California. One ad on Craigslist is offering between 300 and 475 dollars to those willing to participate.

That may sound tempting to many people, but before anyone jumps at that opportunity perhaps they should remember how many people got seriously ill or even died from the 1976 swine flu vaccine.

The CDC's headquarters in Atlanta is even selling a stuffed swine flu toy in its gift shop. The fuzzy pink toy sells for 7.95 and it reportedly comes with an information booklet about the H1N1 virus.

But the U.S. government's main thrust in promoting the swine flu vaccine will come through the media. There is a growing awareness in government circles that a growing percentage of the American population simply does not plan to take the vaccine.

In a recent edition of the San Francisco Chronicle, Kris Sheedy, a communications director with the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, is quoted as telling reporters gathered at the CDC the following:

"Many parents (in focus groups) expressed a lot of concerns about 2009 H1N1 vaccine. Those concerns were centered around the fact that it was new and it was being developed quickly."

In particular, Sheedy recognized that many American parents are very concerned about injecting their children with an experimental vaccine that was rushed into production:

"There were comments such as 'this is new and I don't want my child to be a guinea pig.' "

But whether these concerns are legitimate or not, health "authorities" are already invading the airwaves with the message that if Americans do not take this vaccine that there is going to be a total health nightmare in this country.

Dr. Nancy Snyderman, billed as a "medical expert" at NBC News, is hyping this message to ridiculous lengths. Just check out the video below. The most shocking moment is at the very end of the video where she raises her voice and barks at viewers to "get your damn vaccine".....

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

So is all of this swine flu vaccine propaganda working on you?

Are you going to rush out and let them inject you with an experimental vaccine that is loaded with ingredients that you don't even know about?

The reality is that back in 1976 only one known person died from the swine flu, while large numbers of people were crippled or even died from the swine flu vaccine.

Are you certain that we will not see a repeat of that?

The Shocking March 2009 U.N. Population Control Policy Brief

Most people have no idea that one of the key goals of the United Nations is population control. In fact, an incredibly shocking U.N. population division policy brief from March 2009 has been uncovered that not only discusses the need for population control, but also asks how fertility decline in the least developed countries can be accelerated.

Seriously.

You can read this March 2009 U.N. document right here (but be warned that it is a PDF document, so you will need a PDF viewer to read it):

http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/UNPD_policybriefs/UNPD_policy_brief1.pdf

The policy report begins with this stunning question:

What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?

So who exactly are the least developed countries?

Well, apparently they aren't places that have a lot of white people. The report defines the "less developed regions" this way:

For purposes of this brief, the less developed regions include all the countries and areas of the world except Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, the United States of America and all countries in Europe.

So apparently one of the goals of the report is to eliminate as many black and brown babies as possible. Supposedly the authors of the report feel that the white population around the world doesn't need as much eliminating.

So how does the report recommend that fertility rates be lowered in the developing nations?

"Family planning" of course.

In other words, the women in those nations need to be taught that getting pregnant is to be avoided and that having abortions is a good thing.

The following is just a portion of the report's discussion about family planning:

Lack of access to family planning and, in particular, to modern methods of contraception is a major cause of the persistence of high fertility as indicated by the high levels of unmet need for family planning prevalent in most least developed countries having the requisite data.

So what is behind all of this?

Well, the reality is that the global elite is absolutely obsessed with population control. They believe that the earth is massively overpopulated, and that all of these excess people are ruining the environment.

Even Barack Obama's number one science advisor, John P. Holdren, feels this way.

In 1977, Holdren co-authored a textbook entitled "Ecoscience" where he advocated population control measures that are so extreme that it is hard to believe that he is not clinically insane.

The following are some examples of what has been found in that textbook.....

On pages 787 and 788, the book advocates the mass sterilization of humanity by putting drugs into the food and water supply:

“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.”

On pages 786 and 787, the authors discuss the benefits of the involuntary sterilization of women after their second or third child:

“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

On page 838, the authors of the book reveal that they see nothing wrong or illegal about the government dictating family size:

“In today’s world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?”

On pages 942 and 943 of the book, the authors call for the creation of a “planetary regime” that would control the global economy and enforce population control measures:

Toward a Planetary Regime

“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.”

“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”

Well, it looks like Holdren's dream of a planetary regime that controls the population growth of the planet is closer today than it ever has been.

It is absolutely immoral for the U.N. to ask how they can accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries. Please use this information to alert your family and friends to the horrific eugenics agenda of the global elite.

Obamacare Nightmare: No Wonder Town Hall Protesters Are So Upset

As congressional leaders refer to the recent town hall protesters around the nation as "Nazis", "astroturf" and "racists", the reality is that it is some Democrats who are among the ones most strongly speaking out against Obamacare.

In particular, one article really got our attention today. On Salon.com, Camille Paglia (who voted for Obama) posted a startlingly honest article entitled "Obama's Healthcare Horror". In it, she really detailed the health care nightmare that the Obama administration is in the process of creating.

She says that she still supports Obama, but that Obama "is promoting the most colossal, brazen bait-and-switch operation since the Bush administration snookered the country into invading Iraq with apocalyptic visions of mushroom clouds over American cities."

Wow!

So what is she so concerned about?

Well, the reality is that there is not just one bill to focus on yet. There are actually five bills floating around Congress, but most of them have very similar provisions.

It is what all of those bills have in common that is seriously upsetting bloggers such as Paglia, but also a large percentage of the American population. The following are just a few of the things about Obamacare that have got a lot of Americans really upset.....

*Obama keeps assuring us that you can keep your doctor. But as Paglia points out, what if your current doctor "is not the one appointed by the new government medical boards for ruling on my access to tests and specialists?"

*Obama keeps assuring us that you can keep your current insurance. But what is your current insurer goes out of business because they can't compete with the new government-backed alternative?

*Obama keeps assuring us that there will be no rationing of health care, but the reality is that almost everywhere you find nationalized health care around the world, you find substantial rationing.

*So if there is rationing, who decides who gets care and who doesn't? Well, the government of course. So government bureaucrats could decide if you get to live or you get to die. Well, yes.

*Why is there such a massive rush to pass a health care bill? Why not take the time to present the issues to the American people in an orderly manner? Is this going to be yet another bill that members of Congress pass without reading it?

*The bureaucracy required to run Obamacare would be a nightmare beyond belief and it would quickly send federal deficits into the stratosphere.

*Obamacare will FORCE you to get health insurance. If you do not get health insurance you will be subjected to very heavy fines.

The truth is that you really can't see what a nightmare these bills are until you start to read them. Once you do take a look at what is inside these bills it is enough to get your blood boiling.

The following is one anonymous analysis that has been floating around the Internet of one of the health care bills currently in Congress:

-----

Hidden in the over 1,000 pages of Obama's dictatorial health plan...


Pg 22 of the HC Bill MANDATES the Government will audit books of ALL EMPLOYERS WHO SELF-INSURE!!

Pg 30 Sec 123 of HC bill - THERE WILL BE A GOVT COMMITTEE which decides what treatments & benefits you get.

Pg 354 Sec 1177 - Govt WILL RESTRICT ENROLLMENT of Special Needs people.

Pg 42 of HC Bill - The Health Choices Commissioner will choose your HC Benefits for you.

PG 50 Section 152 in HC bill - HC WILL BE PROVIDED TO ALL NON-US CITIZENS, illegal or otherwise.

Pg 170 Lines 1-3 HC Bill- ALL NON-RESIDENT ALIENS will be exempt from individual taxes. (Resident Americans will pay)

Pg 58 HC Bill - Govt will have real-time access to individuals finances & a National ID Healthcard will be issued.

Pg 59 HC Bill lines 21-24 Govt will have direct access to your bank accounts for electronic funds transfer, no choice.

Pg 72 Lines 8-14 Govt is creating an HC EXCHANGE to bring private HC plans under Govt control.

PG 84 Sec 203 HC bill - Govt mandates ALL benefit pkgs for private HC plans in the Exchange.

PG 85 Line 7 HC Bill - Specs. for of Benefit Levels for Plans.

Pg 95 HC Bill Lines 8-18 The Govt will use groups i.e., ACORN & Americorps to sign up individuals for Govt HC plan.

pg 124 Lines 24-25 HC No company can sue Government on price fixing. No "judicial review" against Government Monopoly.

pg 127 Lines 1-16 HC Bill -DOCTORS/ AMA - The Govt will tell you what your salary will be TAX.

Pg 145 Line 15-17 All Employers MUST auto enroll employees into public option plan. NO CHOICE

Pg 126 Lines 22-25 Employers MUST pay for HC for part time employees AND their families.

Pg 149 Lines 16-24 ANY Employer with payroll 400k & above, who does not provide public option, pays 8% tax on all payroll.

pg 150 Lines 9-13 Businesses with payroll btw 251k & 400k who doesn't provide public option pays 2-6% tax on all payroll.

Pg 167 Lines 18-23 ANY individual who doesn't have acceptable HC according to the Govt will be taxed 2.5% of income.

Pg 195 HC Bill -officers & employees of HC Admin (GOVT) will have access to ALL Americans finances & personal records.

PG 203 Line 14-15 HC - "The tax imposed under this section shall not be treated as tax".


And there's even more astonishing Marxist domination and control...


Pg 239 Line 14-24 HC Bill- Govt WILL REDUCE PHYSICIAN SERVICES for Medicaid Seniors, and low income people.

Pg 241 Line 6-8 HC Bill - Doctors, doesn't matter what specialty you have, you'll all be paid the same

PG 425 Lines 4-12 Govt mandates Advance Care Planning Consultations. (seniors)

Pg 425 Lines 17-19 Govt will instruct & consult regarding living wills, durable powers of atty. Mandatory!

PG 425 Lines 22-25, 426 Lines 1-3 Govt provides approved list of end of life resources, guiding you in death.

PG 427 Lines 15-24 Govt mandates program for orders for end of life. The Govt has a say in how your life ends

Pg 429 Lines 1-9 An "adv. care planning consult" will be used frequently as patients health deteriorates.

PG 429 Lines 10-12 "adv. care consultation" may include an ORDER FOR END OF LIFE plans. AN "ORDER" from the GOVERNMENT on when your life ends.

Pg 429 Lines 13-25 - The govt will specify which Doctors can write an end of life order.

PG 430 Lines 11-15 The Govt will decide what level of treatment you will have at end of life.

-----

By pushing forward proposals such as these, the Democrats are infuriating a large portion of the American people. The American people were already disgusted with the Republicans after 8 years of George W. Bush, and now they are also furious at the Democrats.

The videos below of town hall meetings from all over the nation show that the American people are getting angrier at both political parties than we have ever seen before in our lifetimes.....

#1) Tampa, Florida



#2) Elkhart County, Indiana



#3) Detroit



#4) Austin, Texas



#5) Philadelphia



#6) Arkansas



#7) St. Louis



#8) Romulus, Michigan



#9) Denver



#10) Mehville, Missouri



#11) Troy, Michigan



#12) Maryland



What is even worse is that Barack Obama is actually asking citizens to inform him about anything "fishy" that they see or hear from those who would dare oppose Obamacare.

That is a huge mistake.

Instead of reaching out and trying to reason with the American people, the Democrats are calling them names and asking their supporters to inform on their fellow citizens.

Those types of tactics will only make middle America even angrier. Instead of coming together to try to find some solutions to the health care mess that we are in, America is quickly being torn apart.

Russian Subs Patrolling Just Off The East Coast Of The United States - Will They Attack America Someday?

Most Americans do not realize that relations between the United States and Russia have taken a decided turn for the worse. Things certainly didn't get any better recently when the U.S. military discovered that two Russian nuclear submarines were patrolling off the east coast of the United States.

According to reports, two Akula class nuclear-powered submarines were lurking in international waters just 200 miles of the U.S. coast.

This action by the Russians sparked a firestorm of criticism by the U.S. military.

One Russian military source brushed off any criticism: "Activities of Russian submarines in the world’s oceans outside their own waters do not violate international maritime law and are within normal practice."

According to the Times, Naval historian Norman Polmar considered the Russian move to be highly unusual: “I don’t think they’ve put two first-line nuclear subs off the US coast in about 15 years."

Russia has also recently resumed flights of strategic bombers along NATO borders. About these flights, Anatoly Nogovitsyn, Russia's deputy chief of general staff recently said this:

"This is our right -- we felt bored making circles along our internal routes."

So what does all of this mean?

It means that the Russian military is back - and in a big way.

Relations between the U.S. and the Russian/Chinese alliance are quickly souring, and the reality of a major world war is closer today than it has been in ages.

The reality is that both the Russians and the Chinese view the U.S. as their number one enemy.

They are preparing for a major attack on America someday.

Most Americans don't even realize that the U.S. military has a very difficult time tracking the newest super quiet Russian nuclear subs. They could creep up very close to our shores and we would likely never even know that they are there.

In fact, a number of prophets of God have prophesied that this is EXACTLY how the Russians will one day attack the United States.

For example, the following video contains Henry Gruver's chilling vision of Russian submarines attacking the United States with nuclear missiles:



In addition, the late Romanian prophet Dumitru Duduman was also given a vision by God of the Russians nuking cites throughout the United States:



The truth is that we should be VERY concerned about Russian submarines patrolling off the U.S. coastline. It likely won't happen right away, but if those prophets are right, someday those Russian subs will pop up in the waters just off the U.S. coast, they will launch their missiles, and the cities of America will burn within minutes.

But most Americans seem like they could care less about the future. They are too busy obsessing over the death of Michael Jackson or the latest pop culture fad.

But those who are discerning realize that Russian subs just off the coast of the U.S. is NOT a good sign. Let us just hope that we have as much time as possible before the day of judgment for America comes.