24 Hour Big Brother Surveillance Of Bad Families In The U.K.

There have been many who have written how the U.K. is moving towards becoming a "Big Brother" society. But they are wrong. "Big Brother" is not coming - he is already here. Tonight in the U.K., thousands of "dysfunctional" families are being subjected to intensive 24-hour surveillance to make sure their children attend school, go to bed on time and eat proper meals.

A government that watches you 24 hours a day to make sure that you put your children to bed on time and that you give them the right meals?

How much more bizarre does it have to get?

Approximately 2,000 families have already gone through "Family Intervention Projects", but the government plans increase the scope of this program to 20,000 more families in the next two years.

Why not just watch the families?

In fact, why not just watch everyone all the time to make sure that they are doing every little thing to the government's pleasing?

But the bizarre control of families in the U.K. does not end there. If some in the U.K. government have their way, all parents will soon be forced to sign "contracts" to ensure that their children behave at school.

These contracts will be known as "Home School Agreements" and parents who do not get their children to act the correct way will be faced with huge fines.

In fact, the proposed plan envisions that "good" parents will be able to complain about other parents who fail to ensure that their children behave.

But it is not just families that are facing these draconian "Big Brother" measures. After all, this is a nation where citizens are actually being paid to spy on their neighbors.

I don't know about you, but when I hear things like that, the very worst abuses of places like East Germany and North Korea come to mind.

The reality is that the U.K. is now an extremist "Big Brother" society. If you enjoy having every minuscule detail of your life watched and controlled by the government, then perhaps it would be a great place for you to move to.

But if you value personal freedom and personal privacy, then the U.K. is one of the last places you would ever want to live.

Killer Military Robots That Feed On Dead Human Flesh?

Imagine a future where killer military robots mow down extremist dissidents and feast on their dead flesh. Does that sound like the bizarre plot from a really bad science fiction movie? It's not. It is actually a very real U.S. military program.

The Pentagon has hired a Maryland company know as Robotic Technology Inc. to develop these new robots.

The official name of this new robot is "Energetically Autonomous Tactical Robot", otherwise known by the acronym "EATR".

Yes, these robots will be called "EATRs".

You just can't make this stuff up.

According to the company's website, these EATRs will feed themselves by foraging whatever organic material they find around them:

"The system obtains its energy by foraging – engaging in biologically-inspired, organism-like, energy-harvesting behavior which is the equivalent of eating. It can find, ingest, and extract energy from biomass in the environment (and other organically-based energy sources), as well as use conventional and alternative fuels (such as gasoline, heavy fuel, kerosene, diesel, propane, coal, cooking oil, and solar) when suitable."

That includes human flesh.

These EATR robots will be powered by the Waste Heat Engine developed by Cyclone Power Technology. This engine uses an "external combustion chamber" which burns fuel to heat up water in a closed loop, generating electricity.

The advantage of having robots such as these is that they could refuel and operate independently for months or even years. They would be able to function in almost any environment and would require very little servicing.

But obviously there is one HUGE downside.

In fact, anyone who has seen "The Terminator" can the downside from a million miles away.

Is it REALLY a great idea to be developing futuristic killer robots that feed on dead human flesh?

Any science fiction fan will tell you that such a plan can only end very, very badly.

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Abortion Is About Getting Rid Of Undesirables

At times it is easy to forget how completely obsessed the global elite are with eugenics and population reduction. But an incredibly shocking and offensive quote from Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is bringing the issue of eugenics to the forefront once again.

In an interview with the New York Times, Ginsburg admitted that abortion is about getting rid of certain types of people that the elite do not want to have around:

"Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of."

What in the world?

Somebody needs to ask her EXACTLY what she means by "populations that we don't want to have too many of."

Talk about offensive!

And yet the liberal media has let her slide on this one so far.....

That is because the liberal media is only owned by a handful of elitists, most of which totally agree with the eugenics agenda.

You see, the agenda of population control and of getting rid of undesirables has been around for a long, long time.

For example, Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood expressed her feelings about unborn children this way:

"The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."

A shocking statement indeed, but you can see her philosophies reflected in Planned Parenthood throughout the nation today. In fact, Planned Parenthood regularly plants their clinics in the very poorest of neighborhoods.

By doing so, they help to advance the sick eugenics agenda of the global elite.

On May 5th, Bill Gates, David Rockefeller, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey and several other "super wealthy" Americans gathered for a secret meeting in Manhattan. Apparently one of the most important items on the agenda of the meeting was to discuss how their combined wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world’s population.

So why didn't we hear about this meeting in the media?

Well, the reality is that there was almost a COMPLETE blackout by the American news media of this secret gathering. They reportedly met at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel prize biochemist and the president of Rockefeller University. The secret meeting was supposed to be so discreet that many of the billionaires’ aides were only told that they were at "security briefings".

However, some details about this clandestine meeting have emerged.

According to one major U.K. newspaper, one person who attended this meeting said that "a consensus emerged that they would back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat."

That same article includes some incredibly disturbing quotes about the meeting from that same anonymous source.....

"This is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers."

"They need to be independent of government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all see looming."

In other words, the "big brains" have decided that if they don't start aborting, sterilizing and killing more of us, then we are going to have a disaster of catastrophic proportions.

Which is ridiculous of course. If the greedy global elitists were not hoarding the vast majority of the world's wealth then there would be more than enough resources for everyone.

In fact, the assets of the world's three richest men exceed the combined gross domestic products of the world's 48 poorest countries.

Think about that.

3 men have more money than 48 countries combined!

Talk about greed.

And now the global elitists have decided that they have way too many servants and they need to start "culling" the herd.

Meanwhile, more than 2.8 billion people, close to half of the world's population, live on less than the equivalent of $2 a day.

Hundreds of millions of people are barely scraping by while the global elite of the world discuss how they can keep them from reproducing.

We live in a very sick world.

"Health Care Reform" = Mandatory Health Insurance And Government Control Over Your Health Decisions

The majority of Americans, and especially young Americans, seem to be very enthusiastic about the health care reforms proposed by Barack Obama and the Democrats. However, what most Americans do not realize is that "health care reform" is not going to mean free health care. Instead, it is going to mean that you are forced to buy health insurance, it is going to mean that the federal government will control your health decisions and it is even going to mean that the federal government is going to decide who lives and who dies.

Under the horrific health care bill unveiled by Democrats on Thursday, Americans who refuse to buy health insurance will be hit with heavy fines of more than $1,000. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that these draconian fines will raise around 36 billion dollars over 10 years.

So all Americans will now be forced to hand their money over to greedy health insurance companies.

But when you get sick and need surgery the health insurance company will be there for you, right?

Wrong.

Just ask anyone who has tangled with a health insurance company how horrible they can be. They will do anything to squeeze out of paying a bill if they think they can get away with it.

Government run health care also means mandatory vaccinations. The CDC is now saying that the U.S. may need 600 million doses of swine flu vaccine in order to vaccinate every man, woman and child in the United States this fall.

In the future, if your national health record shows that you have not taken the mandatory vaccines, then you will not be able to get anymore health care until you do.

But there are even more frightening health care changes that the Congress passed earlier this year.

The truth is that the Democrats inserted provisions into one of the "stimulus" bills that gave the federal government COMPLETE control over your health care under a nationalized health care plan.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, otherwise known as "the economic stimulus bill" contained almost all of the key elements of Tom Daschle's ideal nationalized health care system that he outlined in his 2008 book, Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis.

In his book, Daschle wrote that doctors will have to “learn to operate less like solo practitioners” and be willing to accept mandatory government controls and guidelines.

Guess what?

That is precisely what the bill forces doctors to do.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 created a brand new bureaucracy called the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology. This new government organization will monitor all medical treatments to make sure that your doctor is prescribing the exact drugs and medical treatments that the federal government believes are "appropriate" and "cost effective".

The bill also had a provision that hospitals and doctors which are not “meaningful users” of the new system will face serious penalties. The bill also says that the Secretary of Health and Human Service will be permitted to impose "more stringent measures of meaningful use over time".

The bill also radically changed the way that the health care system treats the elderly.

Currently, Medicare pays for medical treatments for the elderly that are considered to safe and effective.

That is all changing now.

Now, a cost effectiveness standard set by a Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research will apply.

The goal of this "council" is to actually slow the development and use of new medications and treatments because they are driving up medical costs.

In her recent editorial, Betsy McCaughey described Daschle's attitude towards the elderly in his book:

He praises Europeans for being more willing to accept “hopeless diagnoses” and “forgo experimental treatments,” and he chastises Americans for expecting too much from the health-care system.

She also goes on to describe how this new "council" would actually make choices to deny health care to elderly patients if they don't have enough "productive" years left:

The Federal Council is modeled after a U.K. board discussed in Daschle’s book. This board approves or rejects treatments using a formula that divides the cost of the treatment by the number of years the patient is likely to benefit. Treatments for younger patients are more often approved than treatments for diseases that affect the elderly, such as osteoporosis.

Do you understand what that means?

It means that now the United States government decides who lives and who dies.

But the American people cheered on Obama and the Democrats as they passed a horrible bill that the vast majority of them did not even read.

So after reading all of this, do you still want "health care reform"? Feel free to post your opinion below.....