Monday, August 17, 2009 Posted by Shattered Paradigm
You can read this March 2009 U.N. document right here (but be warned that it is a PDF document, so you will need a PDF viewer to read it):
The policy report begins with this stunning question:
What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?
So who exactly are the least developed countries?
Well, apparently they aren't places that have a lot of white people. The report defines the "less developed regions" this way:
For purposes of this brief, the less developed regions include all the countries and areas of the world except Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, the United States of America and all countries in Europe.
So apparently one of the goals of the report is to eliminate as many black and brown babies as possible. Supposedly the authors of the report feel that the white population around the world doesn't need as much eliminating.
So how does the report recommend that fertility rates be lowered in the developing nations?
"Family planning" of course.
In other words, the women in those nations need to be taught that getting pregnant is to be avoided and that having abortions is a good thing.
The following is just a portion of the report's discussion about family planning:
Lack of access to family planning and, in particular, to modern methods of contraception is a major cause of the persistence of high fertility as indicated by the high levels of unmet need for family planning prevalent in most least developed countries having the requisite data.
So what is behind all of this?
Well, the reality is that the global elite is absolutely obsessed with population control. They believe that the earth is massively overpopulated, and that all of these excess people are ruining the environment.
Even Barack Obama's number one science advisor, John P. Holdren, feels this way.
In 1977, Holdren co-authored a textbook entitled "Ecoscience" where he advocated population control measures that are so extreme that it is hard to believe that he is not clinically insane.
The following are some examples of what has been found in that textbook.....
On pages 787 and 788, the book advocates the mass sterilization of humanity by putting drugs into the food and water supply:
“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.”
On pages 786 and 787, the authors discuss the benefits of the involuntary sterilization of women after their second or third child:
“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.
The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”
On page 838, the authors of the book reveal that they see nothing wrong or illegal about the government dictating family size:
“In today’s world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?”
On pages 942 and 943 of the book, the authors call for the creation of a “planetary regime” that would control the global economy and enforce population control measures:
Toward a Planetary Regime
“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.”
“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”
Well, it looks like Holdren's dream of a planetary regime that controls the population growth of the planet is closer today than it ever has been.
It is absolutely immoral for the U.N. to ask how they can accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries. Please use this information to alert your family and friends to the horrific eugenics agenda of the global elite.